According to Bloomberg, US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Gary Gensler stated that the architecture used by Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) to provide digital asset custody services is not limited to the Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange traded funds (ETFs) that the bank is considering.

Earlier this week, BNY confirmed that it had submitted a plan to the Office of the Chief Accountant of the SEC to custody these two assets in a way that would protect customer funds in the event of a bank bankruptcy. The agency has expressed "no objection" to the plan, a regulatory term that allows the bank to not worry about its structure violating SEC requirements, which require banks to reflect the value of digital assets they hold on their balance sheets. BNY previously stated to Bloomberg that the SEC's no objection opinion only pertains to the use cases of ETFs.

"Although the actual consultation involves two types of crypto assets, the structure itself does not depend on which type of crypto asset it is." Gensler told Bloomberg after delivering a speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's annual U.S. treasury bond bond market meeting on Thursday: "It does not matter which crypto currency it is."

Gensler stated that the architecture proposed by BNY includes the use of individual cryptocurrency wallets, each with an independent bank account, and prohibits mixing with bank assets. He stated that whether to expand the scope of digital asset use cases suitable for custody depends on the bank's own decision.

Gensler praised BNY's preparation work in ensuring ownership of client assets, ensuring that they are not ranked last in debt repayment in the event of bankruptcy. In recent years, Celsius Network, FTX, Voyager Digital, and other digital asset platforms have gone bankrupt, leaving thousands of cryptocurrency traders in such a predicament.

Gensler said, "If this bank or any other bank uses the same structure, they will receive the same unanimous opinion

Gensler pointed out that multiple banks and brokers have been discussing potential digital asset custody frameworks that can separate client assets from banks, thereby avoiding the requirements of SAB 121. SAB 121 sets out the institution's balance sheet requirements for cryptocurrencies, which have been strongly opposed by the cryptocurrency industry. Earlier this year, US President Joe Biden vetoed congressional efforts to overturn SAB 121.

(责任编辑：银饰)

• ·北京公积金贷款担保中心在哪，住房公积金贷款的担保方式都有什么？
• ·币安下架反成暴涨契机：羊驼币ALPACA庄家操盘揭秘
• ·社保外服服务费计入哪个会计科目
• ·合成生物概念31日主力净流出6.22亿元，平潭发展、牧原股份居前
• ·为什么要用区块链 为什么要用区块链做农产品溯源管理
• ·国际对维卡币的认可-国际社会对OneCoin的态度和认可度
• ·火币骗局
• ·比特币历年减产行情
• ·莱特币行情火币网
• ·meme币官方版最新下载 memeBIAN卓最新手机
• ·YAM币最近价格-yam币价格行情
• ·韩美达成关税及经济安全等多项共识
• ·比特币交易网火币
• ·利润表的构成是怎样的呢？
• ·购买股票佣金-购买股票佣金计入什么科目
• ·富士康概念31日主力净流出9.86亿元，冠捷科技、科森科技居前